Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Grant Marn's avatar

The traditional running game strategy was long overdue for correction. Handing the ball off to a smallish player five yards behind the line of scrimmage in full view of the defense with no deception, where the point of attack is moving toward the defense which is crashing six or seven defenders into the line against five OLs is a lot of things...but smart isn't one of them.

The numbers couldn't have been clearer. The average run in the NFL for decades was around a poor 3.5 yards per play utilized, while each pass on average was more than twice that. How the running attack dominated NFL thinking as long as it did with those awful numbers is a documentary in waiting. As is the mystery of why teams continue to falsely believe today that bubble screens behind the line of scrimmage like extended handoffs - are somehow magically converted into vertical passes. They rarely gain positive yardage. Again, just like with the traditional running attack, there is zero deception in front of the defense and too much traffic to gain significant yardage.

It's easy to analogize the NFL's avoiding the forward pass to the NBA struggling to figure out that shooting 35% on 3s yields more points than 50% on 2s. Arithmetic still works everywhere but in sports front offices it seems. It's an excruciatingly slow roll to the equals sign.

The running game over the past 15 years has cratered further, and for good reason. When you use your QB to run the ball from the gun, you go from zero deception to massive deception that changes the numbers on defense in favor of the offense. Not only does your rushing YPA increase significantly, but the defense must respect the risk of a designed QB run, resulting in less blitzing and fewer defenders in pass coverage resulting in wider passing windows. It's why "run first" dual threat QBs with poorer pocket passing skills have a short lifespan in the League (Cam Newton, Russell Wilson etc.). Like the old TV show the Fugitive, the day their running stops, the show is over.

The other problem with the traditional RB is that they are typically very poor at the two competencies modern passing offenses desperately need - pass catching and blocking. Most RBs are drafted for their running ability, and a 200-pound RB is little match when blocking a 250-pound LB or end is collapsing the pocket. At some point, a team will figure out that moving an additional TE into the backfield will create better blocking (both passing and leading designed runs) as well as pass receiving from the position.

As the NFL has moved to aggressively copy college Air Raid style offenses, the college supply chain has become devoid of talented traditional RBs, and high school coaches are reticent to put their best athletes at the position - opting instead for them to be quarterbacks, wide receivers or defensive backs. The market has responded to the increasing lack of demand for the position which has further accelerated change.

The RBs that do come into the League with hype (e.g. Bijan Robinson) tend to disappoint, and virtually all running backs fall off precipitously after 1,500 touches. Joe Schoen on Hard Knocks was wrong - age isn't relevant to the aging curve, but touches are - 1,500 is the wall. Joe could still be right, however, for the wrong reason as Saquon Barkley is sitting right at 1,500 touches. A falloff would not be a surprise.

In any event, with 1,500 touches hanging over them like the Sword of Damocles, few RBs are effective for even 5 years. Like horse drawn carriages, the world has evolved and innovated traditional RBs to a much reduced role. The game for fans is better as a result.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts